What are you reading? – 4 February 2016

A weekly look over the shoulders of our scholar-reviewers

February 4, 2016
Person holding open book in hand

Carina Buckley, instructional design manager, Southampton Solent University, is reading Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin (Virago, 2001). “In this astonishing masterpiece, Atwood weaves together the threads of four, perhaps five, stories into one gloriously realised tapestry depicting the lives of Iris Chase and her sister Laura, two sheltered girls who can depend only – but imperfectly – on each other. Many-layered and ripe with detail, this is a book that will break your heart and make you glad for it.”


Peter Catterall, reader in history, University of Westminster, has been reading Evelyn Waugh’s Black Mischief (Penguin, 2000). “This 1932 satire is replete with examples of well-meaning but culturally ill-informed attempts at modernisation of the kind still encountered in aid policy. Waugh satirises Westerners and non-Westerners alike with well-directed barbs, while implying that modernising political institutions without changing political culture simply gives unaccountable elites new means to power. Unfortunately the importance of political culture all too often remains overlooked.”


Stephen Halliday, senior member, Pembroke College, Cambridge, is reading Scott Christianson’s 100 Documents That Changed the World: From Magna Carta to WikiLeaks (Batsford, 2015). “A welcome Christmas present; rather Anglocentric (Magna Carta, Shakespeare, Newton, Darwin, etc). I confess I was surprised to learn that Jean-Baptiste Colbert was influenced by Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations – which was published 93 years after Colbert’s death!”


A. W. Purdue, visiting professor of history, Northumbria University, is reading Michel Houellebecq’s Submission (William Heinemann, 2015). “This brilliant novel stars a disillusioned French academic. In the 2022 presidential election, mainstream parties ally themselves with an Islamic party and its leader is elected. France becomes an Islamic state. Offered a well-paid post, François converts to Islam. With uncanny timing, this was published the same month as the attack on Charlie Hebdo’s office; the English translation appeared just before the November atrocities.”


Peter J. Smith, reader in Renaissance literature, Nottingham Trent University, is reading Michael Stolberg’s Uroscopy in Early Modern Europe (Ashgate, 2015). “This fascinating book examines ‘one of the most important practices in the history of Western medicine’. Uroscopy was non-intrusive, cheap and, since the sample was often carried to the uroscopist, it did not require the presence of the possibly non-ambulant patient. Advances in anatomy put paid to the mumbo-jumbo of ‘uromancy’ and ‘piss gazers’, but uro-sceptics’ triumph was gradual: as late as 1937 a certain Dr Pfleiderer was advising ‘his colleagues to continue practising traditional uroscopy alongside chemical analysis’.”

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree
A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes