We need a legislative ban on essay mills

On the International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating, Chris Husbands urges more university leaders to lobby the government to put an end to the pervasive practice

October 17, 2018
Handwritten essay on table
Source: iStock

There was enormous optimism about what the internet would do back in the 1990s, when the online world took on a more recognisable form. It would connect people. It would make the world’s knowledge available to all, opening up libraries, galleries and archives virtually. It would democratise. It would create a new economy. It would, in Google’s mission statement formulation, “do no evil”.

That now seems a long way off. The internet took on the characteristics of hastily thrown-up frontier towns in the Wild West. First came the swindlers and the gamblers, not far behind them the pornographers, and then followed the hate-merchants: money, sex and prejudice all thrown in together. The cacophony of intolerance and cheating has drowned out what now seem naive hopes that digitisation would usher in an era of open knowledge, free-flowing ideas and new opportunities. Identity theft, cybercrime, online bullying and appalling sexual exploitation have become everyday news stories. Increasingly, it’s the internet’s perversions, rather than its exceptional responsiveness and connectivity, that dominate our thinking.

For higher education, “essay mills” are a particularly pernicious growth industry of the digital world. For those not familiar with this term, essay mills are online companies that facilitate cheating by producing assessments to order for students. In some ways, they have always existed. It’s always been tempting for some students to pay someone to do their work for them; however, the internet has vastly eased the relationship between customers and suppliers and, with the worldwide growth of higher education, has fuelled the growth of these essay mills.

The business model is simple but perverted: you have an essay to write, you have a tight deadline. For a fee, the essay will be written. Crooks will do it for you: the fee depends on the length, the standard you are looking for, and the deadline you are facing. I don’t use “crooks” here lightly, but that is what they are. They are frequently found to be mis-selling their services: assuring students that the assignments they provide are “plagiarism free” (they are not) and that universities endorse their services (definitely not). We have even seen such horror stories as these companies threatening their “customers” with exposure to their university or future employer if they do not pay a further fee.

My objection to the use of these services is not about an academic fetishism with referencing systems (brackets, dates, footnotes, italicised titles and the rest) but about understanding that learning is based on integrity and scholarship: showing that students have read, understood and been influenced by the work of others; that they can explain those influences; and that they can then explain how what they are doing is new or different or just, perhaps, a clear explanation of what has gone before. Getting an education is not about getting the grades. It’s about doing the thinking and being an active participant in all the learning opportunities. If some of that is difficult, well, difficulty is the point.

At Sheffield Hallam University, we grasped the implications of essay mills several years ago and decided to tackle the problem. We put in place serious consequences for students who are found to have used essay mills, but we have also worked closely with our students’ union to understand how and why a student might find themselves in a situation where they feel they need to turn to such unscrupulous companies, and worked to address this cause. Our academic development team has been working with course teams to develop “authentic” or “real-world” assessments that also help students to develop time-management skills. We have blocked access to essay mill websites from the university servers, so that if students inadvertently come upon them, a clear message advises them to seek alternative support from our study skills team.

However, no matter how hard we try, the advertisement of these companies continues unabated, via social media, posters and leaflets appearing throughout our campus buildings, or direct messages sent to our students and staff offering their services. Rooting out the manipulative and targeted advertising of these services is absolutely essential. If it’s difficult for the university to police what are (in essence) fly-posted advertisements, it’s impossible to police social media advertising – doing a routine search for an academic paper the other evening, through my home internet service provider, I found myself landing on an essay mill site.

I wholeheartedly endorse the current movement in the higher education sector to stamp out this pervasive practice, and I recently joined more than 40 university leaders in urging the secretary of state for education to introduce a legislative ban on operating or advertising an essay mill. I have also signed the petition to the government to ban essay mills. On this International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating, I would very much encourage others who care about the integrity of the UK higher education system to join me in signing this petition.

Sir Chris Husbands is vice-chancellor of Sheffield Hallam University and chair of the teaching excellence framework.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

Well just a minute. In days gone past I remember writing essays if they didn't match the politics of the staff marking them I would be marked down. So the first World War was all about the shooting of a Grand Duke and nothing else. Fast forward today, and really has that sort of thing changed in a university. As someone who keeps up attendance at one university or another well no. The current political fashion has to be agreed with or no marks. The point is this unless and until a university is bothered to stop this, cynicism of the university system of 'education' will manifest itself somehow. The last two universities I attended I have run successful complaints against and have forwarded some pretty damning evidence about staff integrity. I am an experienced teaching professional and know precisely where to look and analyse. The type of integrity concerns vague marking schemes open to personal interpretation from a member of staff, but also because of the lack of discipline this appears to encourage wilful disregard of a Departments own book of rules. Pretty bizarre day to day operation in a Law Department, but it happened. In another Law Department, in another University senior staff simply lied, and have been caught out by a comprehensive set of correspondence saved overtime. So kindly note that simply making scripts anonymous will not do, although some universities simply do not bother with that at postgraduate level. The universities must clean up their acts particularly in light of the subjective nature of an essay.
It is likely a temptation for overseas students who are basically here to work or for work experience and for whom attending college is just a route to being present legally in the country.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments