Questions of university autonomy and accountability

How do you reconcile university autonomy with the modern desire for accountability? asks Ferdinand von Prondzynski

August 29, 2015
Scotland map

In 2011-12 I chaired a review of governance in Scottish higher education. The main products of the report we issued in 2012 so far are the Scottish Code of Good Governance and, more recently, a Bill now before the Scottish Parliament.

It is not my intention, at least in this post, to restate the case for the recommendations we made or to critique the code and the Bill. However, in the course of our deliberations we came across one recurring theme: how do you reconcile university autonomy (which both we and really all of those who gave evidence strongly supported) with the modern desire for accountability? As universities are free to follow their chosen strategic direction, how are those who take the decisions on strategy answerable to those affected by it, or indeed to anyone at all?

There is, I think, a widespread consensus that this cannot be resolved by allowing governments to direct universities or review their decisions, except that where universities are spending public money they must answer for the expenditure; this indeed is the issue being debated now in the context of the Higher Education Governance (Scotland) Bill.

But if university governors are rightly not accountable to government, then to whom, and how is that accountability expressed? Furthermore, how can it be assured that any framework of accountability does not undermine effectiveness and operational success? How can universities be held to what one might describe as their traditional responsibilities to the wider society, as recently expressed by the new president of Cornell University?

These questions are at the heart of governance review and reform, and having a satisfactory answer will be the key to securing acceptable forms of governance into the future. It is important for universities to accept that autonomy does not mean that those taking the decisions are answerable to none of the key stakeholders; university autonomy is being misused if it is seen by the decision-makers as autonomy from the wider university community of staff and students.

And it is important for governments to understand that controlling higher education institutions condemns them to educational and intellectual mediocrity and compromised integrity.

Ferdinand von Prondzynski is principal and vice-chancellor of Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen. The post originally appeared on his own blog.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

The article raised a very important but less debated area of effectiveness in higher education in the UK as well as a few other developing nations I have and understanding of. The term autonomy - has always been emphasized and taken as a course when questions on accountability comes up. I feel that the intentions to balance the autonomy with accountability should be reflected right from the code of practice / terms of reference. The priorities of governors, their involvement and time, the appointment procedures and over and above their alliance to specific internal groups etc have all a very significant role to play in the process or reviews and strategic oversight. These factors become more serious when the governors are ( unpaid ) volunteers who might be involved in the process on a very few occasions. It is not just the public money requiring an accountability but equally important are the valid expectations of 'STUDENTS' as the key stakeholders and the impact of such decisions on their future. This responsibility is beyond the ratings and scales of excellence of higher educational institutions.