International students are worth more than their tuition fees

A strong international presence on campus is worth more than money in the bank, says Philip Wainwright 

June 8, 2016
Interconnected globe (illustration)

Just over 10 years ago, the president of Emory University, my Atlanta-based institution, told an international planning group that he wanted to hear many languages during his daily walks across campus.

This vision was based on the idea that international diversity and perspectives enrich the classroom and life on campus, while also helping to prepare students for a rapidly globalising world. In the intervening decade, significant elements of that vision have become a reality – not just at Emory but at many US institutions.

However, that growth has arguably been shaped as much by evolving financial and demographic pressures as by long-term planning. 

Read next: Why are international students so important to our universities?

By more strategically realising the aspirations for global education that pre-date the 2008 financial crisis, US universities can improve the educational experience of all students and prepare them better for life after university, while also increasing institutional impact and reputation. 

From 2005 to 2015, the number of international students enrolled at US institutions increased from just over half a million to just under one million. What shaped the magnitude of this shift?

Coping with budgetary shortfalls during the financial crisis, and responding to the impending decline of domestic college-age populations, many US universities recognised the business necessity of international recruitment. The financial crisis coincided with the peaking of the US college-age population and the rapid growth of international college-age populations with the qualifications, desire and wherewithal to study overseas.

Unfortunately, the business aspects have engendered a sense that US students have been facing tougher competition from international applicants for admission to top universities, exacerbated by the overall sense that opportunities for cash-strapped Americans have become more limited.

What gets lost in this analysis are the educational benefits. 

Critics of admitting more international students point to fewer places for domestic students and attribute purely financial motives to university administrations. However, the tension between the international diversity within the student body, the financial needs of the university, and the university’s core mission to educate its students is not summed up so easily.

The relationships between these priorities are complex and differ depending on a university’s mission. First, it is not clear that there are in fact fewer places for domestic students. Second, the financial boost that international students bring to universities actually also benefits domestic students, who would otherwise bear a higher financial burden for their education. 

As the vision for a campus where many languages can be heard on a casual walk reminds us, internationalisation emerged as an educational priority before it was facilitated by business pressures.

Most ambitious universities consider international diversity on campus (along with study abroad) to be necessary for preparing their students for life after graduation, as well as for the enhancement of intellectual life on campus. In the case of state-funded institutions in the US, this aspiration is complicated by the obligation to serve the population of the state, as well as the significant decline in state funding support for those institutions following the economic crisis.

But the need to expose all students to international perspectives and to train them to work in new environments and in different cultures is clear. By sitting in class next to students from all around the world, other students will learn about how people from other countries and cultures view the issues they are studying. Similarly, by living in the same residence halls, they will learn about different attitudes and ways of living.  

As the financial situation has improved, the new presence of international populations on campus and newly created international networks provide universities with tremendous opportunities to strengthen their educational and research missions. International students bring connections that will shape universities for generations to come. 

My own sense is that many US universities have not yet fully understood or embraced the globalisation that has already transformed them.

By shifting away from the view of international students as a solution to budget deficits and by linking international diversity to core institutional missions of education and research, self-conscious and well-thought-out internationalisation can enhance universities’ ability to achieve their goals. The fact that so many students, faculty and staff from overseas are already on campus will only help.

Philip Wainwright is vice-provost of Emory University

Write for us

If you are interested in blogging for us, please email

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Print headline: International students shouldn’t be seen as just cash cows

Reader's comments (1)

I agree studying abroad is not just about academics. Being abroad makes us more Independent, It improves second language skills and improve the ability to work in new environments and ability to adapt different cultures.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham