HE Bill - Lords committee stage: response to government defeat

Lords pass opposition amendment to HE Bill in committee stage

January 9, 2017
Members of the House of Lords
Source: Getty

Peers have voted in favour of an opposition amendment to the Higher Education and Research Bill.

The Lords voted 248 to 221 in favour of the amendment, which addresses the function of UK universities.

Such a vote is rare in committee stage. The amendment was debated over several hours in the Lords today - the first of 516 such amendments tabled.

Defeat for the government could mean that universities and science minister Jo Johnson may feel he has to make changes to the proposed legislation.

Baroness Wolf of Dulwich, who is Sir Roy Griffiths professor of public sector management at King's College London and a crossbench peer, supported the amendment and said it was curious that the Bill "has nothing to say about universities", urging that it should "make it clear what we believe a university is".

The amendment in full

UK universities: functions

  1. UK universities are autonomous institutions and must uphold the principles of academic freedom and freedom of speech. 

  2. UK universities must ensure that they promote freedom of thought and expression, and freedom from discrimination. 

  3. UK universities must provide an extensive range of high quality academic subjects delivered by excellent teaching, supported by scholarship and research, through courses which enhance the ability of students to learn throughout their lives. 2 Higher Education and Research Bill Before Clause 1 - continued 

  4. UK universities must make a contribution to society through the pursuit, dissemination, and application of knowledge and expertise locally, nationally and internationally; and through partnerships with business, charitable foundations, and other organisations, including other colleges and universities. 

  5. UK universities must be free to act as critics of government and the conscience of society.”

Sue Garden, Liberal Democrat higher education spokesperson in the Lords, said: “It is vital that our universities are retained as autonomous institutions, free to promote freedom of thought and expression and to bring the best and brightest students and academics to the UK.

"With this vote today we have taken a step to ensure the independence of universities, free from the political interference of this and future governments.”

Labour MP Wes Streeting, a former president of the National Union of Students, said the vote signalled the the House of Lords' intentions.

Current NUS vice-president for higher education, Sorana Vieru, went further - speculating that the vote could be the first of many - with dire implications for the legislation.

However, Alex Proudfoot, chief executive of Independent HE - which represents independent education providers, who could well benefit from the reforms in the bill - interpreted the vote differently, foreseeing a safe passage for the government's proposals. 

And Lord Lucas, a Conservative peer, is convinced that the amendment will amount to little.

Lib Dem peer Lord Goddard offered an observation on the duration of the debate on the amendment.

There are five further dates scheduled for the committee stage of the bill in the Lords, with the next on 11 January and the last on 25 January.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham