Five nightmare scenarios that haunt academics

Pat Thomson identifies five abiding fears that prey on the scholarly mind

March 2, 2016

1. The latest book manuscript disappears. It’s almost done and it would be unbearable to lose it. I can’t even comprehend coming back from the loss, having to rewrite it all. But it won’t happen. It really won’t. No, really. I have multiple copies, the publishers have a first version, as do reviewers, it’s in the cloud, it’s on my back-up drive, etc, etc. Still, I worry.

2. My reference library disappears. One day I wake up and it doesn’t work any more. Oh hang on, that has happened. That’s when the various platform developers don’t talk to each other…the new version of Word doesn’t talk to the bibliographic software, and the helpline just says “yes” and the website says don’t trash your old copy of Word because you’ll need it for a while as we sort out our new compatible version….Yeah, right. As it happens, I didn’t trash the old version because I’m suspicious of all of you. The lot of you, every last one.

3. I lose the thesis I am examining. Well, it’s never happened, but it could. Really, it could. And I would look – and I would be – so unbelievably stupid going back to the university (and to the doctoral researcher) saying that I can’t find the big book any more. Hardly a vote of confidence in your examiner, is it? But I guess that they’d replace it and what I’d really lose is face.

4. I forget to turn up for a viva. I’ve switched my diary entirely over to digital, and it regularly seems to lose things and to get confused across different time zones. I’m still recovering appointments from the invisible early hours of the next day, a legacy of when I was away at New Year in Australia. I can live with missing meetings and messy appointments, and I’ve got used to fessing up to having not managed conflicting appointments as well as I might. But it would be unthinkable – no, the trouble is that it’s entirely thinkable – to manage to miss a viva.

5. One of those emails offering me millions of pounds from a distant dead relative, those emails that I just trash as soon as I see them, is actually true. One of those emails telling me to change my password and check my balance because I have weird new transactions is true. One of those emails telling me to change my email password in 10 days is true. Oh hang on, it was. I’ve been locked out of my email once before because I didn’t recognise the difference between the real IT and the fake. Well, they look so similar, anyone could do it. It took a long wait and then a phone call to get it back, but I’d rather it didn’t happen again. But how to know which of the multiple scams might just be the real one?

Really? Not afraid, eh?

Oh well then – just call me paranoid.

Pat Thomson is professor of education at the University of Nottingham. This post originally appeared on her blog.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Related universities

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer in Journalism UNIVERSITY OF ROEHAMPTON
Technical Instructor, Film and TV UNIVERSITY OF ROEHAMPTON

Most Commented

University of Oxford students walking on campus

University of Oxford snatches top spot from Caltech in this year’s World University Rankings as Asia’s rise continues

Home secretary says government will support 'best' universities

Man handing microphone to audience member

Academic attainment of disadvantaged students can be improved if they can decide how they are assessed, study claims

Italy's gold medallist

New measures to ensure universities are ‘not penalised’ for taking poorer students also outlined for next stage of TEF

Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir meeting over coffee

Claims for genius require more than repeated assertion to make the case, says Martin Cohen