US college ranking launched by Times Higher Education

New ranking of colleges, due for publication in September 2016, has been developed with input from key US sector bodies and experts

May 30, 2016
Racetrack starting grid,: US college ranking
Source: iStock

The first WSJ/THE US College Ranking is out now

Times Higher Education has announced plans for a new and pioneering college ranking for America – underpinned by the launch this week of a major national student engagement survey.

The US college ranking, due for publication in September 2016, has been developed after a year of consultation by THE’s senior data and editorial teams with key US sector bodies and experts, which concluded that the current range of university and college rankings in the US are not fit for purpose.

The new ranking will put student learning at its heart, with a focus on student outcomes – including completion and employment – and with unique features examining the value added by colleges. It will draw significantly on an entirely new national survey capturing student engagement.

A second phase of consultation launches this week in the US, at the Association of Institutional Research Forum in New Orleans, and at Nafsa, the Association of International Educators, in Denver. THE’s plans will be discussed in a series of meetings and via an online poll.

US college rankings: frequently asked questions

Phil Baty, editor of the THE World University Rankings, said: “Times Higher Education has served universities and colleges with news, analysis, insight and data for five decades now, and we were pioneers with global university rankings back in 2004.

“Now, after a major investment in our data team, we believe we are ready to provide innovative new metrics that will dramatically enhance the information available to students wishing to study in the US, and help US institutions achieve due credit for the contributions they make to students’ learning and to their lives after graduation.

“There is a clear need for a different type of US ranking system. Too often US universities are judged by how selective they are in admissions, or on their institutional wealth. Our intention is to level the playing field and get a clear view of performance in a much wider range of institutions from across the rich and diverse US higher education landscape.”

The ranking will draw on a range of data sources, including the US Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), managed by the US National Center for Education Statistics, and the US Department of Education’s College Scorecard. But importantly, it will also feature unique data gathered by THE.

The primary new source will be the Times Higher Education Student Survey, which will gather student views on about 1,000 institutions. The survey will focus on capturing students’ engagement with their learning and value for money.

Duncan Ross, THE’s director of data and analytics, said: “We have launched one of the most wide-ranging national student engagement surveys ever undertaken. This research will ask students across the US for their opinions on the effectiveness and value of their education. By exploring these in a focused, concise way, we will be able to see much more about the impact of college on students.

“We think the opinion of students is too important to hide, so for the first time this type of information will be put into the public domain. By making the results available to prospective students, and to colleges themselves, people will gain new insights into how different universities compare.”

Trevor Barratt, managing director at THE, said: “Our business has undergone a dramatic transformation in the past two years – we have put a very large investment into data: building a team of data analysts and scientists. The investment has allowed us to break new ground in the field of university performance metrics and analytical tools.

“This major new investment in the US, backed by the opening of our Chicago office last year, is a central part of our transformation into a global data business.”

Have your say and help us improve US college rankings: take our quick online poll

Shape the methodology: join our webinar on 30 June to hear about the planned methodology in detail, and give us your feedback  

Join the conversation on Twitter by using #USCollegeRankings and citing @THEWorldUniRank

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (2)

This is a great work, there was a real shortage of a comprehensive ranking for US universities. I I have a question, will be this ranking subject based, I mean for example ranking for Civil Engineering, .... etc.? Moreover, do you have any plans for developing a ranking system for graduate schools in US? Thank you.
Hi. Thanks for your kind comments - we are very excited to bring a different perspective on US institutions. At first, we'll be looking at universities and colleges in the round, so ranking at an institutional level, but over time we expect to be able to go deeper and deeper and rank at the subject level. Much will depend on the quality and the depth of the data.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham