Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education College Rankings 2017 table information

October 12, 2016

The overall Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education College Rankings 2017 methodology explores four key areas:

Resources

Does the college have the capacity to effectively deliver teaching? The Resource area represents 30 per cent of the overall ranking. Within this we look at:

  • Finance per student
  • Faculty per student
  • Research papers per faculty

Engagement

Does the college effectively engage with its students? Most of the data in this area is gathered through the THE US Student Survey. The Engagement area represents 20 per cent of the overall ranking. Within this we look at:

  • Student engagement
  • Student recommendation
  • Interaction with teachers and students
  • Number of accredited programmes

Outcomes

Does the college generate good and appropriate outputs? Does it add value to the students who attend? The Outcomes area represents 40 per cent of the overall ranking. Within this we look at:

  • Graduation rate
  • Value added to graduate salary
  • Value added to the loan repayment rate
  • Academic reputation

Environment

Is the college providing a learning environment for all students? Does it make efforts to attract a diverse student body and faculty? The Environment area represents 10 per cent of the overall ranking. Within this we look at:

  • Proportion of international students
  • Student diversity
  • Staff diversity
  • Student inclusion

Our ranking table also offers information for prospective students on the average costs and potential benefits of attending each of the ranked institutions. These are:

  • Out-of-state tuition and fees: Out-of-state average tuition and fees for full-time undergraduates 2014-15 (IPEDS 2014 data file)
  • Room and board: On campus, room and board 2014-15 (IPEDS 2014 data file)
  • Salary after 10 years: Median earnings of students working and not enrolled 10 years after entry (College Scorecard 2011 and 2012 data files)

For more detail on the pillars and metrics please read the full College Rankings 2017 methodology.


WSJ/THE College Rankings updates policy

The Wall Street Journal and Times Higher Education will, from time to time, update the online versions of the WSJ/THE College Rankings to reflect the current status of colleges’ ranked position.

Updates may be made if there was a publishing error, or if an institution’s data has been corrected in a way that impacts the public ranking, for example, and upon the annual publishing date.

Times Higher Education will also update an institution’s notification dashboard to be consistent with the ranking information available to the public, and document the updates within the Update History section below.

 

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate