Racial divide is higher education’s ‘dirty secret’

Race is higher education’s “dirty little secret” and more should be done to tackle the issue, a debate has heard.

December 16, 2012

Mark Crawley, dean of students at the University of the Arts London (UAL), told the Race in the Creative Process event that the sector needed more discussion about the discrepancy in attainment between black and minority ethnic students.

“Higher education has a dirty little secret: white students get more firsts and 2:1s than black students – and no one even talks about it,” he said.

Detailed analysis of the figures made it clear that this applied even when differences in social class had been taken into account, he added.

“We don’t know why this is,” admitted Mr Crawley, “but we should certainly talk and disagree about it.”

The debate, which took place at the Chelsea College of Art and Design on 12 December, was organised by UAL’s Shades of Noir project, which aims to raise awareness of race issues in the art, design and communication industries.

Panellists were asked about how they dealt with their own unconscious biases, which parts of the “creative education process” should be “devoid of any race connections” and whether they saw a place for “positive discrimination”.

Fairooz Aniqa, students’ union cultural and diversity officer at UAL, put the case for trying out blind marking, to see if that had an impact on results.

She also argued that there was a role for positive discrimination in arts education as “the only way to break the nepotistic nature of the creative industries”.

Sculptor and artist Hew Locke noted that “teaching should be about encouraging people rather than making allowances for their backgrounds”.

However, he said he recognised, and often knew personally, all the black British artists listed on Wikipedia. He looked forward to the day when there were so many that a large proportion would be unfamiliar to him.


You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

'Students’ union cultural and diversity officer at UAL...argued that there was a role for positive discrimination in arts education as “the only way to break the nepotistic nature of the creative industries”.' Did I read that right? Positive discimination is unlawful in most cases in the UK. The Cultural and Diversity Officer should know this, and it is extremely disturbing for it to be officially advocating that kind of practice. UAL's policy is to eliminate all forms of discrimination, so why is it that ArtsSU are going against this and demanding more?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry