Oxbridge to be stripped of special funding feeding the tutorial system

Oxford and Cambridge will lose institution-specific funding from Hefce as cash is diverted to small specialist providers

July 2, 2015
Stone pig gargoyle on wall

Annual funding worth £7 million that helps to support the Oxbridge tutorial and interview systems is set to be cut.

The universities of Oxford and Cambridge receive £4.2 million and £2.7 million a year respectively in “institution-specific” funding from the Higher Education Funding Council for England as a contribution to “particular” costs faced by the universities, including having smaller class sizes and holding interviews with almost every undergraduate applicant.

No other undergraduate university has ever received additional funding for such purposes, with the deal agreed about 15 years ago in lieu of the abolition of Oxbridge college fees. However, the funding body has now confirmed that the two institutions will no longer be eligible for a share of its £65 million funding stream, which will now be concentrated on small specialist providers in disciplines such as music, drama and art.

The change is part of a review of institution-specific funding, led by former Arts Council England chair Sir Christopher Frayling, which will require specialist providers to show that they are providing “world-leading teaching”.

The funding stream has been subject to several previous reviews, but new rules stating that at least 60 per cent of an institution’s activity must be based in one academic cost centre mean that Oxbridge is no longer entitled to apply for funding.

A spokesman for Oxford said that it was aware that “Hefce funds are under increasing strain” and an earlier consultation had made it clear that “it was likely we would no longer be eligible to apply for this funding”.

“The university will be forced to identify funding from other sources to safeguard its high-quality, tutorial-based academic teaching,” he added.

A Cambridge spokesman said that it had made a case for the funding, but had “anticipated” its ending “for some years” so it came as “no great surprise”, adding that the university had “time to adapt” to the changes.

The planned withdrawal of the funds comes ahead of next week’s emergency Budget when details may be released of how universities will be affected by in-year cuts worth £450 million to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute, said that a lack of transparency over Oxbridge’s cost base – in addition to the upcoming cuts – may also explain why it is in line to lose institution-specific funding.

“Oxford has said it costs £16,000 to educate an undergraduate, but it has never given policymakers the evidence to substantiate this figure,” he said.

“If their goal was to keep this money, they have never really done enough to provide information on how they spent it,” he added.

The change in eligibility criteria may also threaten other institutions that have previously received institution-specific funding.

The School of Advanced Study at the University of London, which is due to receive £9.2 million next year from the stream, is no longer listed by Hefce as eligible.

The University of London said that it recognised that the SAS did not meet the criteria laid out in the review, but would “expect ongoing support from Hefce following the very positive review in 2012 of the School of Advanced Study’s national role in supporting, promoting and facilitating research in the humanities”.

A Hefce spokeswoman said that it had consulted over the potential changes and is now “in discussion with institutions that do not meet the criteria for funding to consider the impact of this”.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Gosh! A move towards a level playing field, whatever next.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest