Further clarity?

May 18, 2017

Although the Lords’ amendments were similarly swilled away in the wash-up, the Technical and Further Education Act 2017 had a far less rocky ride into law than the Higher Education and Research Act, which also received Royal Assent on 27 April.

The TFEA was a child of the post-16 skills plan of 2016. Among the plan’s recommendations was that the government should undertake: “further work to examine how to ensure clear progression routes develop from levels 4 and 5 to degree apprenticeships and other higher education at levels 6 and 7. This work should be carried out in the context of existing and proposed structures and funding rules for higher education provision in England.”

Not much detailed attention seems to have been paid to the overlap between the two, with reference to the provision of courses at these “higher education” levels and the consequences of the changes to “structures and funding rules” that the Higher Education and Research Act will bring about.

The reader of the new TFEA legislation might be forgiven for thinking that the main idea is to close down further education colleges as tidily as possible. Much more detailed legislative provision is now available for that than for disposing of the failing higher education providers envisaged under the new Higher Education Act.

Could we have some joined-up thinking soon on all this, please?

G. R. Evans

Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan