Would-be heavyweights: the rise of open access mega-journals

This graph shows the dramatic rise of open access mega-journals such as Plos One, which offer to publish papers based on their scientific soundness rather than the significance or novelty of the results, and which accept research across a broad range of disciplines

December 8, 2016
The rise of open access mega-journals (8 December 2016)

View and/or download a high-resolution version


Two journals dominate: Plos One, which published nearly 27,500 papers in 2015, and Scientific Reports, a sister publication of Nature, which published 10,600.

But Plos One publications are down 9 per cent on last year, and a monthly analysis found that Scientific Reports overtook it in September this year.

Advocates argue that accepting articles simply because they are scientifically sound cuts rejection rates and saves time; but mega-journals, which charge to publish articles, have also been accused of being “cash cows” to subsidise publishers’ other, more selective journals.

Mega-journals make up only a tiny fraction of academic publishing; in 2015, they accounted for 2.5 per cent of all articles, found “Open-access mega-journals: a bibliometric profile”, itself published in Plos One.

When it came to citations, mega-journals varied widely. Articles in Scientific Reports gained an average of 12.4 citations, the highest of the group. Sixty per cent of mega-journals analysed had a higher average citation rate than journals in general.

However, average citations have been widely criticised as a measure of journal quality, not least because of the variation between papers. Many fewer articles in Scientific Reports garnered no citations than in the theoretically more prestigious Nature, where more than 30 per cent attracted none.

david.matthews@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns