Wellcome Trust accuses science journals of ignoring public interest

October 10, 2003

Market-obsessed scientific publishers are ignoring the interests of science and the public, the Wellcome Trust has said.

The trust published an independent analysis of the £22 billion research-publishing market. The trust's ultimate goal is for research results to be available free to all on the internet.

Trust director Mark Walport said: "We are funding research for the public good and expect results to be available throughout the world free of charge."

He said there was a place for subscription-based journals with some exclusive content, as long as they had a free web issue.

But Professor Walport said: "The journals want the work that is going to have the highest profile, so a lot of high-quality research is unlikely to be published."

Phillip Hurst, senior manager for publishing services at the Royal Society, warned of a lack of quality control on the internet.

He said the society was keen for research to be widely accessible, but noted that labour-intensive peer review and editing made publishing costly.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments