Wellcome offers cash for public engagement

Dedicated funding and support for UK scientists

October 10, 2013

The Wellcome Trust hopes to spark a major improvement in the volume and quality of public engagement by allowing researchers to bid for dedicated funding while applying for mainstream scientific grants.

The trust already has a series of funding schemes for public engagement, but according to Clare Matterson, its director of medical humanities and engagement, these are typically accessed by organisations rather than individuals.

She admitted that as well as lacking funding, scientists often saw no professional advantage in public engagement. But she said this was changing as senior academics realised its ability to improve staff communication skills and grasp of their work’s wider social significance.

She hoped that by making it “much more straightforward” for Wellcome- funded researchers to access dedicated funding (as well as training and support) for public engagement, more people would get involved. But applicants will be expected to submit high-quality proposals specifying who they “want to talk to and why, and what is the best way to do it”.

“It’s important to do high-quality public engagement if we want to attract young people into science and make it part of the national conversation. We can do more damage by doing it badly,” she said.

Depending on their scale, the applications will be reviewed either in- house or in consultation with external experts.

Ms Matterson insisted that the trust would continue to fund outstanding researchers not interested or skilled in public engagement. But the charity’s assessment of the public engagement element of proposals will be communicated to peer-review panels and she envisaged it being used as a tiebreaker between applications of similar scientific quality. If that encouraged applicants to take public engagement seriously, that “would not upset” her.

There is no upper or lower limit on bids, but the trust expects to dedicate up to £4.5 million a year on the initiative, roughly 1 per cent of its budget.

“If a major funding organisation comes forward and says ‘Yes, public engagement is important and we are going to ensure you have the money to do it properly,’ that will hopefully send a very important message,” Ms Matterson said.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham