Wellcome gets frosty over lab costs

April 25, 1997

The Wellcome Trust warned this week that it would consider withdrawing funds from universities in the United Kingdom if medical research charities were forced to contribute to university laboratory running costs.

The charity, which is the largest private funder of research in British universities, has said that if a levy to cover overheads was charged, it would need to consider alternatives, such as setting up its own independent research units or fully funded Wellcome centres within universities, or even moving more of its research funding overseas.

Currently the trust spends Pounds 250 million on medical research annually, the majority of which is in the UK. Following government cuts to infrastructure in 1995, the trust imposed a moratorium on support for university equipment and buildings.

But Dame Bridget Ogilvie, the trust's director, has issued a further warning to universities, the Government and to Sir Ron Dearing, who is considering how infrastructure and overheads can best be funded. "The Wellcome Trust has to consider how best to use its resources to meet the objectives laid down by our founder Sir Henry Wellcome to fund biomedical research," she said.

Diana Garnham, general secretary of the Association of Medical Research Charities, said: "Nobody has to fund research in universities," she warned. "Charities don't have to put it there."

Universities were generally seen as the best place to do most research. "But it's not just a question of quality, but also value for money," she said.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns