Vice-chancellors urge retention of right to appeal on visas

UUK lobbies Parliament over immigration bill concerns

March 6, 2014

Home Office officials often make “poor quality” decisions when they reject student visa extension applications, Universities UK argues, making it vital that the government does not scrap the right to appeal.

The vice-chancellors’ body is lobbying to alter aspects of the immigration bill, currently at the committee stage in the House of Lords.

It fears the loss of appeal rights for student visa extensions, the introduction of a £150 annual levy to use the National Health Service and landlord checks on students’ immigration status could deter international students from coming to the UK.

Under the plans, instead of being allowed to appeal to a judge, students who have failed to get a visa extension will have to apply for “administrative review” by the border agencies.

UUK points out that, according to government statistics, 49 per cent of appeals on student and working visas are allowed, proof of the “poor quality of initial decision-making” and the need to retain the right of appeal. There is also concern that the Home Office will have “a vested interest in not overturning the decisions made by its own officials”, according to a UUK briefing.

But in supporting documents to the bill, the government argues that the current appeals system “creates the risk that an extended appeals process is exploited by those seeking to remain in the UK”. It adds that the administrative review system, already used for initial applications for a visa, overturned 21 per cent of initial entry clearance decisions in 2012, proving that it “does make a difference”.

In January it emerged that in 2012-13, international student numbers in the UK had fallen for the first time on record.

UUK’s lobbying comes in the context of a surprise rise in net migration to 212,000 in the year to September 2013, up from 154,000, casting doubt on the government’s pledge to reduce it to the “tens of thousands” by 2015.

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Programme and Delivery Manager

University Of Leeds


Maynooth University

Occupational Health Manager

University Of The West Of Scotland

Senior Veterinary Epidemiologist

Scotland's Rural College (sruc)