V-c gives his vote to differential fee system

June 15, 2001

Students from affluent families must pay the full cost of higher education tuition, Bristol University's vice-chancellor Sir John Kingman said this week.

Universities should compete for students, some of whom would receive means-tested government scholarships, according to Sir John, who delivered the university's annual Bolland lecture.

Sir John said: "The difference in public funding for a student from the very poorest family and one from the very richest is a mere £1,050 a year. The result is that public support of the universities is a social benefit taken up by those who need it least.

"The vicious circle can only be broken if the government targets its money at those students who need it most - and if better-off families pay the real cost of their children's education."

Teaching income would come from market-rate student fees meaning that the publicly funded block teaching grant could be abolished. Scholarships would be funded by government and institutions would be free to award their own scholarships.

"The universities would be in real competition, on quality and cost groundsI Universities would have a much stronger incentive to give value for money," he said.

Sir John is the second vice-chancellor from the Russell Group of research-led universities to call for top-up fees.

Sir Colin Campbell, vice-chancellor of the University of Nottingham, has championed differential fees since last year. Others have acknowledged the need for reform - Sir Richard Sykes, rector of Imperial College, London, has described flat-rate tuition fees as "not viable in the long term".

Differential fees have been backed by new Labour think-tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns