‘User’-friendly REF panels to gauge impact

Hefce reveals 215 assessors chosen from outside academy

June 20, 2013

More than one in five of those sitting in judgement on the quality of scholarly work in the 2014 research excellence framework will not be academics but instead will be drawn from companies, the government and organisations such as charities.

This is more than double the proportion of research “users” who were included on panels in the final research assessment exercise and is part of the government’s controversial drive to increase the importance of research “impact”.

In the 2008 RAE, the forerunner of the REF, just under 10 per cent of panellists were research “users”.

But in 2014, 20 per cent of overall results will depend on the assessments of research’s impact outside the academy, be it on the economy, society or wider culture. As a result, the number of research users is being increased to reflect this proportion.

On 20 June, 215 new assessors, mainly drawn from outside universities, were announced to “augment the expertise” of the 770 panellists already confirmed, most of them academics, although at the time of going to press their identities had not been revealed.

People from businesses and the public sector will be represented, according to a statement issued by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, as well as figures from charities, thinktanks, the media, libraries, galleries and polling organisations.

Hefce says there will be “significantly more” research users on panels compared with the final RAE.

The users “will help to assess the impact that universities’ research has had on the economy, society and culture”, it adds.

Another 50 panel members are being sought “to fill some remaining gaps in expertise”, the statement says.

On average there will be around six user members on each of the 36 research subpanels, which will assess different areas of scholarship.

The results of the REF will determine how much money each university receives in quality-related research funding, which will total more than £1 billion in England in 2013-14.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham