Use overseas arms to fund mission, expert says

March 27, 2008

Every UK university should consider opening outposts abroad or expanding online course provision to overseas students to help secure their futures.

That is the view of Kelvin Everest, director of academic affairs (China) at the University of Liverpool, who said success in these areas helped to ensure that universities could continue "doing what universities do". Liverpool set up a new university with Xi'an Jiaotong University in China in 2006.

Professor Everest said: "UK education is very good. All the universities ... are serious institutions. If the US were really to get its teeth into this it would be quite a different situation, but at the moment we are top of the range and quite small, and there is a great hunger out there worldwide to try to reap the benefits of what we have to offer," he said.

"I think every university in this country really should ... think about what's going to be a viable way of operating. You have to do it, and the market is big enough for everyone in Britain to do it."

But Professor Everest cautioned against viewing overseas provision as a cash cow. "It is not the case that you stumble across a licence to print money. If you succeed, you reposition yourself so you can go on doing what universities do - support research and support education.

"Unfortunately, if you make mistakes ... the reputational loss can be very serious - so it's not something to be casual about."

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October