Universities may lose 6,000 student places to FE colleges, Labour says

Up to 6,000 undergraduate places that are being auctioned off to low-cost institutions will go to further education colleges rather than universities, the Labour Party has claimed.

October 3, 2011

Figures published by Labour suggest that of the 20,000 student places the government is removing from universities’ general quotas to auction off to institutions charging fees of £7,500 or less in 2012, over a quarter will be snapped up by colleges.

The move - set out in the higher education White Paper – is intended to drive down prices, but universities have claimed that student choice is being restricted.

Critics say the government is effectively forcing thousands of students, who are likely to be from poorer backgrounds, to go to a college rather than a university.

However, David Willetts, the universities minister, said: “It is wrong to suggest that courses offered at further education colleges are of lower quality than universities.”

Gareth Thomas, Labour shadow universities minister, said the move came at a time when colleges themselves were facing budget cuts.

“The government’s plans put at risk thousands of places at universities with international reputations while expecting further education colleges that are facing cuts of 25 per cent themselves to offer far more degree places,” he said. “This is yet another sign that the government's plans for universities have not been thought through, and crucially, which put the quality of higher education in this country at risk.”

The Labour analysis, which uses data from the House of Commons library, suggests that the colleges that would gain places include Newcastle College (400), Blackpool and Fylde, Blackburn, Bradford and Manchester colleges (300 each), and Hull College and the Grimsby Institute of Further and Higher Education (200 each).

Labour has previously released data identifying which universities may stand to lose the most places under the new system, suggesting that members of the Russell Group of large research-intensive universities could lose between 1,500 and 3,200 places in total.

john.gill@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Technical Officer (Paramedic)

Staffordshire University

Professor in Marketing

Henley Business School

Lecturer or Senior Lecturer in Social Work

University Of The West Of Scotland

Research Service Manager

London School Of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (lshtm)
See all jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women