FORMER members and officers of the Association of University and College Lecturers have far more common cause with the Association of University Teachers than was ever likely with Natfhe. Paul Mackney's derogatory references (THES, February 6) to this "tiny organisation" belie the fact that AUCL survived and grew over 25 years despite the cynical attempts of Natfhe to sideline and repress it at every opportunity.
Last September AUCL, as a small, thriving and solvent union, dedicated to advancing its members' interests in higher education, particularly in pursuit of an independent pay review body, took some 3,000- plus academic and related staff from the 1992 universities and colleges into the Association of University Teachers.
Natfhe remains tied to the totem of free collective bargaining, which has caused a catastrophic decline in salaries. Dearing showed that over 60 per cent of academic staff in the 1992 institutions support a pay review body and found remarkable the disparity of views between staff and "the union professing to represent them".
Just whose views does Natfhe represent?
Neil Macfarlane, Former chair AUCL, vice president AUT
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now