Union lobbies for Scottish pay review

June 25, 1999

The Association of University Teachers Scotland has called on the Scottish Parliament to take a lead in Britain in setting up an independent pay review.

The AUTS yesterday held the first lobby of the Scottish Parliament, flagging a motion that seeks support for a pay review, tabled by Liberal Democrat MSP Donald Gorrie, and backed by Scottish National Party MSP George Reid.

It says the review is needed "to maintain academic pay at the level necessary to continue to develop the quality of Scotland's world-class universities".

David Bleiman, assistant general secretary of the AUT, has told enterprise and lifelong learning minister Henry McLeish that there is clear majority support in the Scottish Parliament for independent pay review, and that there is no reason to await legislative developments south of the border.

"Where Scotland leads, Westminster may follow,'' he said.

But the union's continuing aim is a pay review body for the whole of Britain. While the AUTS concedes that the Scottish Parliament has the power to set up an exclusively Scottish pay review system, this is not its preferred option. It warns that a Scotland-only solution would intensify pressure on the parliament's budget, since it would not draw in any extra cash under the Barnett formula, which governs public spending.

Mr Bleiman told Mr McLeish that this was a "compelling reason" to strive for a UK-wide solution.

"Scotland will attract Barnett formula funding, if any outcomes of pay review apply in England as well as Scotland."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns