Unease remains over EPSRC’s ‘shaping capability’ deadline

The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council has been warned that the deadline set for final decisions on its controversial “shaping capabilities” programme may be too tight to allow the necessary consultation with researchers.

November 25, 2011

Academics working in fields overseen by the EPSRC have been up in arms about the approach, which will decide whether to grow or shrink research areas on the basis of their national importance, as well as existing excellence and capacity.

In an attempt to quell the anger, the EPSRC has pledged to work more closely with learned societies on implementing the programme.

However, in a statement released today, the Institute of Physics says that while it is pleased that the research council has “confirmed that research excellence will remain preeminent in assessing funding allocation”, it still has concerns.

“We welcome the EPSRC’s intention to engage further with the research community,” the statement says.

“We have indicated our willingness to facilitate this process by helping to identify physicists with the knowledge and expertise to advise EPSRC on the issues involved.

“However, there is no clarity on the precise form of consultation proposed by EPSRC, in particular whether it will be sufficiently comprehensive in its reach to gather views from all those affected by the proposed changes.

“We remain concerned that EPSRC’s commitment to announce final decisions by March 2012 may not allow a realistic timescale for all views to be taken into account.”

The EPSRC could not be contacted for comment.

john.gill@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride