Undervalued, not overqualified

December 21, 2007

In my Society for Research into Higher Education conference paper on reshaping the academic workforce, I wanted to draw attention to the thousands of teaching and research academic staff with a PhD who were after the last RAE classified research inactive, and also to the thousands of PhD-qualified academics on teaching-only contracts. My concern was that, after getting a PhD, they might not have the opportunity to undertake research as part of the work they are employed to do. I did not intend to imply that teaching was a second-best option. With hindsight, I realise that the term "overqualified" was inappropriate, not least because of the value for teaching staff of a research qualification to help them as reflective practitioners. My apologies.

Stephen Court, Senior research officer, University and College Union.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Knowledge Exchange Manager, Innovate

Royal Holloway, University Of London

Accommodation Assistant

Edinburgh Napier University

Customer Service Advisor

Bpp University

Medical Research Specialist, Anatomy

United Arab Emirates University