Undervalued, not overqualified

December 21, 2007

In my Society for Research into Higher Education conference paper on reshaping the academic workforce, I wanted to draw attention to the thousands of teaching and research academic staff with a PhD who were after the last RAE classified research inactive, and also to the thousands of PhD-qualified academics on teaching-only contracts. My concern was that, after getting a PhD, they might not have the opportunity to undertake research as part of the work they are employed to do. I did not intend to imply that teaching was a second-best option. With hindsight, I realise that the term "overqualified" was inappropriate, not least because of the value for teaching staff of a research qualification to help them as reflective practitioners. My apologies.

Stephen Court, Senior research officer, University and College Union.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments