UEA sets example in policy for investment

March 31, 2000

The University of East Anglia is to become the first United Kingdom university to pursue an ethical investment policy with its central funds.

The university assembly agreed the step on Monday after a working party recommended that ethical investment is both financially and legally viable.

Finance managers will gradually screen out arms manufacturing companies from the university's main holdings and will consider other ethical issues as they arise.

Finance law prevents the making of investment decisions solely on an ethical basis, but the council concluded that, since some shareholdings might be detrimental to the university, they can be avoided.

Andy Marriott, student union finance officer and a member of the working party, said: "UEA has students and staff from around the globe. It is not the best thing for students coming here, who may have suffered under a repressive state, to see that UEA has been part and parcel of arming that country. This is the crux of our justification."

Penny Shepherd, executive director of the UK Social Investment Forum, believes that organisations are increasingly accepting that their reputation is affected by the investment decisions they make.

She said: "This first adoption by a university illustrates that the concern about ethical investment has spread to the academic community."

UEA formed the working party on ethical investment last March.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University