UCU plans strike ballots over pay and pensions

Union sets out timetable for ballots over industrial action in relation to the pay and USS pension disputes

June 28, 2019
Ballot box

The UK’s biggest higher education union has warned universities to expect “serious disruption” as it announces strike ballots over pay and pensions.

The higher education committee of the University and College Union, which has more than 120,000 members across the UK, met on 28 June and agreed that the ballots will run from 9 September to 30 October.

The final 2019-20 pay offer made by the Universities and Colleges Employers Association, which represents 146 higher education institutions, was a 1.8 per cent minimum rise. This rises to 3.65 per cent for the lowest paid.

This fell well short of UCU’s demand for an increase that was equivalent to inflation as measured by the retail price index – currently 2.4 per cent – plus 3 per cent, or £3,349 – whichever is greater.

“Pay has been held down for too long and USS members are running out of patience,” said Paul Bridge, UCU’s head of higher education.

The pensions dispute over the Universities Superannuation Scheme was the subject of a 14-day strike last year.

Employee and employer contributions are set to rise to 10.4 per cent and 22.5 per cent respectively in October, before another hike next April.

“Every day seems to bring some new damning revelation about USS. Their response has been wholly inadequate, as has that of Universities UK,” added Mr Bridge.

“If universities are not prepared to work with us on pay and pensions, then they will face serious disruption later this year.”

Members in about 140 universities will be balloted over pay and in 69 institutions will be balloted over USS pensions.

The ballots will be disaggregated so each institution will be polled separately.

A UCU ballot over strike action on pay in 2018-19 fell short of the required 50 per cent threshold required for industrial action.

A UUK spokesman said: “While employers are keen to avoid a further damaging dispute, it is clear that a ‘No detriment’ solution where employers and members refuse to pay additional contributions will not be acceptable to the USS trustee or The Pensions Regulator.

“We continue to seek a conclusion to the valuation that all stakeholders can support.”

A Ucea spokesman said it was “very conscious that the final offer is already pitched at the very limit of what is sustainable” for employers with “real financial pressures being felt and continuing uncertainty over funding and Brexit”.

nick.mayo@timeshighereducation.com

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

Occupational Health Manager

University Of The West Of Scotland

Senior Veterinary Epidemiologist

Scotland's Rural College (sruc)

Architecture Manager

University Of Leeds

Research Associate

Kings College London