UCU members back strike action over pensions reform

Union members have overwhelmingly backed plans for industrial action over changes to pensions

October 20, 2014

Source: Alamy

In a ballot involving 69 higher education institutions, 78 per cent of members of the University and College Union who voted said they supported strike action over changes to the Universities Superannuation Scheme.

Some 87 per cent who voted said they would back action short of a strike, which could include a marking boycott.

The turnout of 45 per cent was the highest in a national higher education ballot since UCU was formed in 2006, the union said.

The results, which affect pre-1992 universities, were published ahead of talks between the union and employers’ representative scheduled for 22 October.

They follow the publication of plans by Universities UK to end the final salary scheme offered by USS and move about 150,000 active members to a career average scheme, with a defined contribution element. However, benefits accrued would be protected up to the point of change, which would likely be in April 2016.

Sally Hunt, UCU general secretary, said members have “made it quite clear today that they reject the radical changes being proposed for their pensions”.

“We will go into talks on Wednesday hopeful that we can resolve the current impasse,” she added, saying she wanted to see “real improvements” to the proposals tabled by UUK.

“If the employers do not address our concerns then we will meet on Friday to determine what forms of disruptive action we take and when they would start,” she added.

A UUK spokesman said: “We are disappointed that the UCU is already threatening to affect students with an assessment boycott.

“Everyone is aware that pensions are a vital part of the higher education pay and reward package, but the USS negotiations between UUK and UCU have not yet concluded.

“UUK believes that the employers’ proposals are the best that can be achieved in terms of protecting employees’ salaries, given the substantial scheme deficit and the risks to the future viability of the scheme if these reforms are not implemented.

“Universities have to protect their students and cannot accept partial performance from staff. This would be a damaging course of industrial action aimed directly at disrupting students’ education.”

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns