UCU members back strike action over pensions reform

Union members have overwhelmingly backed plans for industrial action over changes to pensions

October 20, 2014

Source: Alamy

In a ballot involving 69 higher education institutions, 78 per cent of members of the University and College Union who voted said they supported strike action over changes to the Universities Superannuation Scheme.

Some 87 per cent who voted said they would back action short of a strike, which could include a marking boycott.

The turnout of 45 per cent was the highest in a national higher education ballot since UCU was formed in 2006, the union said.

The results, which affect pre-1992 universities, were published ahead of talks between the union and employers’ representative scheduled for 22 October.

They follow the publication of plans by Universities UK to end the final salary scheme offered by USS and move about 150,000 active members to a career average scheme, with a defined contribution element. However, benefits accrued would be protected up to the point of change, which would likely be in April 2016.

Sally Hunt, UCU general secretary, said members have “made it quite clear today that they reject the radical changes being proposed for their pensions”.

“We will go into talks on Wednesday hopeful that we can resolve the current impasse,” she added, saying she wanted to see “real improvements” to the proposals tabled by UUK.

“If the employers do not address our concerns then we will meet on Friday to determine what forms of disruptive action we take and when they would start,” she added.

A UUK spokesman said: “We are disappointed that the UCU is already threatening to affect students with an assessment boycott.

“Everyone is aware that pensions are a vital part of the higher education pay and reward package, but the USS negotiations between UUK and UCU have not yet concluded.

“UUK believes that the employers’ proposals are the best that can be achieved in terms of protecting employees’ salaries, given the substantial scheme deficit and the risks to the future viability of the scheme if these reforms are not implemented.

“Universities have to protect their students and cannot accept partial performance from staff. This would be a damaging course of industrial action aimed directly at disrupting students’ education.”


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham