Trial of Italian seismologists ‘misguided’, experts warn

A decision to charge a group of Italian seismologists and officials with manslaughter for failing to predict an earthquake that killed over 300 people “defies belief”, according to a UK expert in the field.

September 21, 2011

The group of seven on trial in the city of L'Aquila, which was hit by an earthquake that killed 309 people in 2009, include officials of the national Civil Protection Agency and several seismologists, including Enzo Boschi who was at the time president of the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology.

The local authority is also reported to be seeking damages of €50 million (£43.6 million).

The trial has been criticised by associations including the American Geophysical Union and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Dan Faulkner, senior lecturer in rock mechanics at the University of Liverpool, warned that the Italian authorities may be “shooting themselves in the foot” by bringing the case.

He said current understanding of earthquake prediction was “rudimentary at best”, and that it would take a “huge scientific effort” to gain the necessary knowledge to improve.

Such an effort “will not be encouraged prosecuting those who are best placed to make these advances”, he said.

“Earthquake prediction is a notoriously tricky business,” De Faulkner explained.

“Often we know the location of seismically-active faults, and hence can predict that earthquakes are more likely in these areas on time periods of tens to hundreds of years.

“In light of this, it defies belief that Italian scientists could be accused of ‘negligence’ with regard to predicting the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake in central Italy.

“Detailed scientific research has told us that each earthquake displays almost unique characteristics, preceded by foreshocks or small tremors, whereas others occur without warning. There simply are no rules to utilize in order to predict earthquakes.

“Earthquake prediction will only become possible with a detailed knowledge of the earthquake process. Even then, it may still be impossible.”

john.gill@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan