Treasury 'betrays' Labour pledge

December 26, 1997

THE Treasury is behind a deal struck with employers that betrays the government's public commitment to improve education and training for 16- and 17-year-olds, it has been claimed.

Liberal Democrats say that the deal, to quell business and industry fears of higher training costs, undermines provisions in the government's Teaching and Higher Education bill. They also say it flies in the face of the Kennedy agenda for widening participation in post-16 education.

Part three of the bill, published last month, allows 16- and 17-year-olds time off work for study and training. Young employees, it says, should take a nationally recognised academic or vocational "external qualification" that is likely to enhance their job prospects.

Phil Willis, Liberal Democrat spokesman for further and higher education, said he took the bill to mean that young employees would get paid time off to take day-release courses at FE colleges. But the Confederation of British Industry expects the bill to be amended to allow workplace training.

Mr Willis said that the Treasury deal would exempt some employers from the obligation to release employees. Instead they could continue with the same minimal levels of in-house training they have provided for years. Young employees would not necessarily gain any recognised qualification and thus find the training of little help in the search for a job. "This is a total betrayal of the principle of lifelong learning and training," he said. "It is part of chancellor Gordon Brown's commitment to British industry that there will be absolutely no additional taxes."

Mr Willis has asked education secretary David Blunkett for clarification, in particular if certain employers will be exempt from allowing 16- and 17-year-old staff time off for study or training.

The CBI backs legislation to provide more structured education and training for 16- to 19-year-olds but wants this to be implemented "sensitively" - on the basis of what is right for both employee and employer.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns