Top research institutions in plant sciences and mycology

June 30, 2011

The table (see related file, right) features the top universities and research organisations in the field of plant sciences and mycology based on highly cited papers published during the period 2000 to 2010, among those that fielded at least 50 such papers.

Three rankings are offered: by number of highly cited papers, by citations to highly cited papers and by citations per highly cited paper. Highly cited papers are defined in the Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators database, from which these statistics derive, as ranking in the top 1 per cent by citations for their field and year of publication.

Some 4,012 plant sciences and mycology papers were identified as highly cited during the period covered, and these were cited a total of 428,316 times, for an average of 106.76. Thus, the top 20 institutions ranked by citation impact surpassed the average score for such influential reports.

The nations represented by these 36 institutions include, in rank order, the US (20), Japan (four), France (two), Germany (two), the Netherlands (two), the UK (two), Australia, China, Spain and Sweden (one each).

Papers in plant sciences and mycology were defined as those published in discipline-specific journals indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science database.

Papers published in multidisciplinary journals such as Science and Nature that could be identified as related to plant sciences and mycology were also included in this analysis.

For more information on Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators, see

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan