‘Thesis whisperer’ pans ‘grooming’ of ill-suited students for PhDs

Australian expert highlights evidence indicating that good grades do not necessarily translate into success in doctoral training

August 5, 2020
Woman helps a man who prepares for an attempt to fly, using wings made from balsa wood
Source: Getty
Woman helps a man who prepares for an attempt to fly, using wings made from balsa wood

High-performing students are “groomed” for PhDs by academics who recklessly assume that good marks equip people for doctoral studies, higher education’s self-proclaimed “thesis whisperer” has warned.

Inger Mewburn, director of researcher development at the Australian National University, told Times Higher Education that would-be supervisors consigned people to a life of “trauma” when they ignored evidence about a lack of correlation between earlier results and the prospects of PhD success.

She said that universities should recruit more carefully as Covid-19 laid waste to academic job prospects. “Anyone you admit into a PhD should be able to pass,” she said. “Illness, accidents, life problems permitting, that person should be able to finish. You shouldn’t admit anyone who can’t, because there’s too much hanging on it.”

Dr Mewburn has counselled not only her own students but also the 100,000-plus followers worldwide who have paid more than 9 million visits to her Thesis Whisperer blog. She started it a decade ago, worried that too many PhD candidates were suffering self-doubt in isolation – unaware that many of their peers felt exactly the same way.

Dr Mewburn said “magical thinking” was partly to blame, with students assuming that their past successes would propel them through doctoral studies and early career academia, despite being forewarned about the scant job prospects. But the unrealistic expectations “didn’t come from nowhere”, she insisted.

“Their thinking is heavily influenced by the thinking of people around them. They’ve believed people they shouldn’t have believed. When they come against the cold hard reality, they feel like they’ve been sold defective goods.”

She said that PhD recruiters “groomed” the sorts of students “who go and talk to their lecturers at the end of class. They get drawn into doing various bits and bobs of work. They get included; they get excited; they get told ‘you’re one of us’.

“I’ve seen this time and time again. I see it now. What’s driving me nuts during this pandemic is that I still hear supervisors saying to their candidates, ‘you always knew it was tough; you’re just going to have to tough it out’ – which is not true. This moment in time is a complete break with anything we’ve known previously. But they’re still saying to their students, ‘you’re great; you’re the best’.”

Dr Mewburn said that careful consideration should determine who received the “rare and precious privilege” of doing a PhD. Instead, recruiters awarded places on the strength of grade point averages, which were not reliable indicators of future success.

“You have to be academically smart enough, but there’s so much more to it than that. But we take the people who have achieved highly in a course with the assumption that they’ll do well in a PhD.”

That assumption was demonstrably false, she said, citing US researcher Barbara Lovitts’ finding that students who do well in coursework often fare poorly in independent research. “We’re actually ignoring the evidence,” Dr Mewburn said.

“[We should recruit] people who are self-starters [and] good networkers, who can deal with failure and uncertainty; people who know when to break rules and when to observe them. These are qualities that people develop in the workplace and through life. We should interview them like they’re workers as well as look at their academic success.”

The pandemic demanded a new approach, she added. “We should be seizing the moment to change.”

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: ‘Thesis whisperer’ pans ‘grooming’ of ill-suited students for doctorates

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

Agree completely. In the Arts and Social Sciences in particular (where projects are generally individual rather than team based), a PhD is a long and often lonely road, with many shady valleys for every bright hilltop, and students need an inner fire and resilience to keep them going during the cold nights. They should not be led by someone else's enthusiasm and ideas.
I think this may be why I'm enjoying PhD research much more now - as a member of academic staff with a career outside of academia behind me - than I did an abortive attempt (in a different discipline) straight after an undergraduate degree. Even though I don't have sufficient time, due to a full-time job, rather than the research being my job like it was the first time around. Now I'm really haveing fun! Moreover, it doesn't matter as much... I have a permanent position and I'm over 60 anyway :)
100% agree with the points raised in the article, and indeed, this has raised an interesting question about what makes a 'true' PhD. To me, resilience, and a passion to explore and learn, are key. I've only been in academia for less than 2 decades, but already I've seen too many PhDs taking the easy-way-out attitude, such as 'Why bother learning this or that (when the existing knowledge can get you a pass)?' or 'Lucky that I don't have to do data collection in my PhD'. PhDs should not be a means to an end, but it should only be the beginning of lifelong learning and exploration.
Very true! A PhD has the "mountain climbing" aspect in that you do it because it is there. To see it reduced to a mere set of "learning outcomes" as has happened to taught courses misses the point of the qualification. All education should be transformational but my PhD in the 80s was in a different league compared to my UG studies. In fact, it is worrying if one of my students keeps saying that everything is fine since that means they probably have not started the struggle with material that is suitable for their PhD.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Sponsored