THE survey reveals university staff split on USS pensions reform

Our Best University Workplace Survey 2015 shows disparate opinions on the need for changes

November 27, 2014

Source: Alamy

Protest: 48 per cent of academics disagree that pensions need to be reformed

A survey of 4,000 UK university staff has revealed stark differences in opinion regarding the need for reforms to higher education pensions.

Some 48 per cent of academics who have so far taken part in the 2015 Times Higher Education Best University Workplace Survey disagree that university pension provision needs to be reformed for the sustainability of the sector, while only per cent of those in professional and support roles hold this opinion.

Russell Group academics are marginally more likely to agree that pensions need to be reformed (25 per cent) than academics across the sector as a whole (24 per cent), with more than a third (34 per cent) of those in professional and support roles saying the same. The remainder of respondents did not declare an opinion on the issue.

Responding to our survey, which is still open to all employees of UK universities, a professor at a university in London that is a member of the Universities Superannuation Scheme, said that the “proposed changes to the pension scheme are wholly unacceptable and very demotivating”.

“We were told in 2011 that the changes then would make the scheme sustainable,” he said. “What is happening now will have a major long-run negative effect on our capacity to attract the best staff internationally, and breaks the fundamental contract that we thought we had when we entered the academic profession.” Proposals to move staff at pre-92 universities who pay into the USS’s final salary scheme to a career revalued benefits scheme, introduced for new entrants in 2011, resulted in a marking boycott by members of the University and College Union, which began on 6 November. The action is suspended at the time of writing.

A spokesman for the UCU said: “The THE survey shows what UCU has been saying is true, namely that many staff are unconvinced of the need for the extreme reforms proposed by the employers.”

Universities UK has said that it is committed to preserving an “affordable, attractive and sustainable pension scheme” but that a recovery plan is needed to address an £8 billion deficit.

As THE went to press, hard-line UCU members were still calling for a special conference of branch delegates to decide on the way forward in the pensions dispute, amid concern about union leaders’ decision to accept the potential end of the final salary element of the USS.

Thirteen union branches have reportedly passed motions calling for such a conference. If 20 branches pass the motion, the UCU will be required to hold the event.

Take part in the 2015 THE Best University Workplace Survey

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

This survey is still open. How much value can we place in these results? Statisticians please scrutinise..

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi