The perils of online ‘friendship’

June 6, 2011

Thinking of befriending your students on a social-media site? You may want to think again. While it may be a good way to meet students “on their terms”, a lawyer specialising in the use of social media has said that it can also be a mistake.

Elizabeth Rita, a partner from the US law firm Kelly, Stacy and Rita, said that the legal issues surrounding the use of social media were still a murky area.

“There is no overriding legal rule determining how universities and colleges should use social media,” she told delegates at the annual conference of Nafsa: Association of International Educators last week. “This is an evolving area of the law.”

Ms Rita acknowledged that the use of social media to interact with students was an issue that divided opinion in the academy, but said that she would advise lecturers not to become “friends” with students on sites such as Facebook.

While it is possible for academics to set up separate profiles for their professional and personal lives, Ms Rita said that many students did not make the same distinction when choosing whom to allow access to their data online.

“Be careful what you wish for: if you look, you will find,” she cautioned. “You can’t control what you see. You might be learning things about students that you decide are not beneficial for you to know.”

On the question of whether institutions could sanction students for comments posted on social-media sites, Ms Rita said that it was vital that universities had consistent protocols.

Although some universities do keep an eye on sites such as Facebook, there is evidence that students have grown wise to the fact that they are being monitored.

In one case at George Washington University, students advertised a party on Facebook, knowing that campus security were checking up on such events.

When security officers raided the party looking for alcohol, they found an empty house full of biscuits and cakes with the word “beer” written on them.

Ms Rita advised institutions to be aware of social-media activity while realising that not all student communication could or should be monitored.

But she warned: “Things over which you have control you will be [expected] to have knowledge of. You ignore them at your peril.”

sarah.cunnane@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Forrest Post Doctoral Research Fellow

University Of Western Australia

Research Fellow in Statistical Epidemiology

London School Of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (lshtm)

Phone Advisor

Gsm London
See all jobs

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'