Thanks to cuts, we may not have the tools to finish fees job, Hefce warns

Efforts to smooth path to new funding regime 'at risk', chief executive says. Simon Baker reports

June 16, 2011

The "capacity and capability" of the English funding council to help universities as they move to the new system of fees and finance is being put "at some risk" by the need to slash its own administrative budget, its chief executive has warned.

Writing in the body's annual report, Sir Alan Langlands says he has concerns about "the cumulative effect on our organisational performance" of attempts to control costs.

The Higher Education Funding Council for England was asked by the government to deliver savings of £2 million in the 2010-11 financial year - a figure that represented a real-terms cut of about 11 per cent of its running costs.

These savings have been achieved through measures such as limiting recruitment, freezing pay for staff earning above £21,000 a year, commissioning fewer policy reports and reducing investment in buildings and infrastructure projects, the annual report says.

An internal group was set up to help identify savings that would not harm the body's core work, but Hefce now faces further cost cutting to meet a government target to reduce spending by 16 per cent in real terms over the next four years.

The report expresses concerns about whether the tight spending controls would allow Hefce to "attract suitably talented and experienced staff to business-critical posts" as it tackles the major overhaul of the higher education funding system.

Sir Alan, whose own salary was frozen at £230,000 last year, writes in a statement included in the report: "Hefce's capacity and capability to continue to perform as an effective organisation that meets the expectations of its stakeholders is put at some risk by the constraints imposed on administration costs and the impact of other government spending controls."

He cites the example of Hefce not being able to replace some staff from outside the Civil Service without approval from the business secretary, Vince Cable, adding: "Inevitably, this affects our ability to seek staff from the widest talent pool and manage our resources and internal control system in the most efficient way possible.

"These controls impact on several activities and we have concerns about the cumulative effect on our organisational performance."

Meanwhile, the report also reveals that Hefce's gender pay gap is 44 per cent - more than double that of the public sector as a whole, in which men earn an average of 19 per cent more than women.

The funding council said that while the differential was "cause for concern", it was due in particular to the body employing more women than men in lower-paid jobs, an issue it had already identified and was working to address.

simon.baker@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald