Switzerland downgraded by EU on research involvement

Move follows referendum decision to restrict immigration

February 26, 2014

EU European Parliament

Swiss-based researchers will no longer be able to apply for European Research Council grants following its referendum decision to restrict immigration from other EU member states, the European Commission has confirmed.

Following the 9 February referendum, Switzerland declined to sign a protocol extending free movement to Croatians. The EU responded by breaking off negotiations on the country’s participation as an “associate member” of Horizon 2020 and the Erasmus+ student exchange programme.

Associate countries are non-EU members who participate in European programmes as full members in return for accepting EU rules, including on the free movement of people. Switzerland was an associate country in previous framework programmes and was very successful. In the most recent ERC call, for its Consolidator grants, only the UK, Germany, France and the Netherlands were awarded more grants.

In a statement issued on 26 February, following a debate in the European Parliament, the commission says negotiations on Switzerland’s participation as an “associate country” in Horizon 2020, which officially began on 1 January this year, “could not be completed”.

It will now be deemed a “third country”, at least for 2014, which means its universities and businesses can still participate in Horizon 2020 programmes, including Marie Curie Actions, but will not automatically be eligible for funding and will not count towards the minimum number of participants required for a project. Swiss-based researchers will also be unable to apply for ERC grants.

László Andor, EU commissioner for employment, social affairs and inclusion, told the European Parliament that further negotiations would be put on hold until Switzerland signed the protocol on Croatian free movement.

“In the absence of an international agreement on determining the conditions for Switzerland’s association to Horizon 2020, Switzerland does not participate in this programme as an associated country,” he said.

“As for Erasmus+, Switzerland has now missed the time for the 2014 grant award decisions. This means that in 2014, Switzerland will not participate in Erasmus+ on equal footing with member states as initially envisaged and its participation will be limited to cooperation activities as with any other third country.”

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Why was Switzerland as a non EU country aloud to apply for and one assumes; received EU research funding in the first place ?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham