Success key to trainee cash

April 28, 1995

Cash for colleges and other providers of youth training could soon be largely dependent on the success of the trainee, writes David Charter.

Training and Enterprise Councils are being asked by the Department of Employment whether week-by-week funding for trainees should switch to 25 per cent payment on recruitment and 75 per cent on outcome achievement.

The TECs are free to contract with providers in their own way and would be able to pass on these funding criteria.

A consultation document from the DoE says outcome funding "gives clear incentives to TECs and providers to offer training that leads to positive results for young people. By making a greater proportion of the budget dependent on the achievement of the outcome, there is an incentive to improve both the quality of the training delivered and the assessment and guidance offered to a young person prior to their starting training".

Between 25 and 40 per cent of funding for Youth Training is currently linked to the outcome of the programme, but the majority is based on the time spent training on a week-to-week basis.

"TECs and training providers have to maintain administrative systems to record and claim for both weekly payments and outcomes," said the DoE.

Pilot funding schemes based on starts and outcomes have been run with six TECs in Youth Training which in all cases increased the NVQs achieved per 100 school-leavers.

The DoE consultation document acknowledges the fears already being voiced by TECs and colleges.

Potential drawbacks include cash-flow problems, since a steady stream of outcomes is necessary and the temptation to provide short, cheap courses to maximise income.

There is also the risk of abusing the NVQ system because of an increased pressure on the achievement of qualifications.

The DoE says one possibility is to retain interim payments for "milestones" - individual units of an NVQ, for example.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns