Students pleased with their stake

October 15, 1999

Responses to Learning to Succeed, the white paper on 16 to 19-year-olds

Students welcome the white paper's stress on coherence.

The National Union of Students is pleased about the creation of a national learning and skills council and the opportunity for feedback, consultation and representation with further education students that it allows.

But the union has reservations about the proposed split inspection arrangements between Ofsted and the Further Education Funding Council.

The FEFC inspection system, it argues, has "a range and sophistication not matched by Ofsted's pass/fail criteria" and is better fitted to the diverse students and curricula of further education.

The NUS is also worried that the white paper may have a damaging effect on student representation on boards.

While students are now represented through elected governors on college corporations, there is no assurance in the white paper that students would be represented to the same level on national and local learning and skills councils.

The union also criticises the lack of substantial proposals to improve staff pay and conditions.

Finally, while the union welcomes ending the division between so-called "schedule 2" fundable courses and unfundable "leisure" education for adults, it would like to see more attention given to level 3 qualifications.

These are crucial to the lifelong learning agenda but are not "meaningfully" discussed in the white paper, it says.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns