Students outraged by lack of complaints procedures

October 15, 1999

Cambridge University is one of the only universities in Britain without formal procedures for hearing student complaints and appeals, the Cambridge students' union said this week.

Its president Tristan Jones said it was "disgusting" that Cambridge still did not have clear procedures in place, despite ministers' repeated calls for universities to establish "fair and robust" systems following the 1997 Dearing report.

Dearing gave institutions two years to review their procedures to ensure they "reflect the principles of natural justice", are transparent and timely, include procedures for reconciliation and arbitration and an independent, external element.

On the instruction of ministers, who are concerned that some universities are not taking the recommendation seriously, the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals recently conducted a survey of the sector which found that all universities, except six which failed to respond, had procedures in place.

Mr Jones added: "We are one of the worst-represented student bodies in the sector." The students will campaign on the issue in the new independent student newspaper, The Cambridge Student.

Juliette Crispin, education officer for the students union, said the university had no procedure for complaining about exams, but students could complain to their tutor or director of studies about tuition, and could complain to faculties about lectures, although each faculty had its own system. She said the university had set up a working party to discuss the system.

Cambridge said that the university was waiting "like the rest of the sector" for more guidance. A code of practice on complaints is due next month.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University