Students foot bill for growth

July 17, 1998

STUDENTS and not the government are funding the bulk of a Pounds 280 million cash boost for universities that still leaves institutions with an overall per capita cut.

Claims by the government this week that, as part of the comprehensive spending review, it has increased funding for universities in 1999-2000 from Pounds 4.8 billion to nearly Pounds 5.1 billion, a rise of 5.7 per cent, are bogus.

This is because in 1999-2000 students will contribute an estimated Pounds 250 million in fees which mean a saving to the government. On top of this the government will net Pounds 100 million by not paying maintenance grants. While the government says it is ploughing in Pounds 280 million students will therefore directly or indirectly pay out Pounds 350 million. This is Pounds 70 million more than the increase announced for higher education.

And, despite the extra money, universities still face a 1 per cent efficiency gain in 1999-2000. Inflation and the cost of funding an estimated 35,000 extra students whittles the 5.7 per cent cash increase down to an estimated 0.8 per cent decrease. Education secretary David Blunkett confirmed the cut in a letter on the CSR to Martin Harris, chairman of the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals. Mr Blunkett said the efficiency saving would be "no more than 1 per cent".

University research receives a Pounds 1.4 billion boost over three years. Pounds 400 million of this is private money from Wellcome.

Further education colleges will receive a welcome Pounds 255 million more in 1999-2000, an 8.2 per cent cash increase. The sector's efficiency gain will be cut from 2.75 per cent in 1998-99 to 1 per cent. The college sector had asked to be on a par with universities.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns