Student loan proposals ‘outrageous’, says Labour

The government should urgently clarify its plans for the sale of the student loan book and reassure existing graduates that their repayments will not be raised, according to Labour’s shadow higher education minister.

June 14, 2013

Shabana Mahmood spoke after it was revealed that a report commissioned by the government included proposals to increase interest rates on student loans for 3.6 million borrowers in England who took out loans over the past 15 years.

The report, by Rothschild investment bank and examining how the coalition could sell student loans issued since 1998, was obtained by the False Economy website under the Freedom of Information Act, according to a story in The Guardian.

Increasing the amount that students repay into the loans system would make the loans more attractive to prospective private buyers.

In the report, the authors apparently suggest a script the government could use if it wanted to persuade graduates to accept the worsening of their conditions: “We all live in difficult times. You have a deal which is so much better than your younger siblings (they will incur up to £9,000 tuition fees and up to RPI [inflation] + 3 per cent interest rates).”

Rothschild found the current cap on interest rates for the older loans – either RPI or banks’ base rate plus 1 per cent, whichever is lower – is a deterrent to potential investors. The options it proposed, according to the newspaper, include removing that cap, which at present keeps repayment rates at 1.5 per cent. Lifting it would mean applying an interest rate of 3.6 per cent, in line with RPI of 3.6 per cent in March 2012.

In a statement, the Department for Business Innovation and Skills pointed out that the government “has not made any changes to the pre-2012 loans interest rate terms…Work on the feasibility of selling the pre-2012 student loan book is ongoing.”

But Ms Mahmood said the Rothschild proposals to raise interest rates on existing loans “to pay for [the government’s] privatisation of the loan book is outrageous. It would represent a complete betrayal of the 3.6 million affected students who thought they were taking out loans on completely different terms.”

She added: “The government must now urgently clarify their plans regarding the sale of the student loan book, and reassure graduates that their repayments will not be raised simply to pay for their costly financial smoke and mirrors.”

Liam Burns, the president of the National Union of Students, said: “Despite pushing them to establish in law that conditions on student loans could not be altered retrospectively the government refused and instead gave weak assurances that they had no plans to do so. Now we see their own advisors are suggesting that very move.

“By raising tuition fees the government shifted much of the cost of education on to students, and these proposals would hit recent graduates. When are those who benefited from the boom years going to take their share of the burden like [universities and science minister] David Willetts said they should before he was in government?”

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

Two details that highlight the state of competence that this government has got to. First, they had Rothchilds do the research. How they ever thought that would look good... Second, when releasing it under FOI they used a marker pen to redact it that didn't obscure the text. So incomptent (unless, are they are planning something grim in the CSR and we are getting even nastier versions floated so that we feel better when its not so bad)
What are the universities doing with their windfall to enable students to earn enough to repay their loans? Are they investing the increased fees in their students to stimulate a much better economy?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show