Stick to quality

November 5, 1999

The report on the Quality Assurance Agency's qualification blueprint filled me with dread ("New rules will scrap 'negative' awards", THES, October 22). While there may be a need to standardise qualification titles, the principal role of the QAA should be to assure quality, not conformity, nor even, arguably, consistency.

The whole notion of the QAA seems to be based on bean-counting in terms of credit accumulation and transfer and it would appear that its philosophy is "never mind the quality, count the credits". It is symptomatic of that philosophy that the QAA blueprint calls for the abolition of the pass degree and contains phrases such as: "It is unacceptable that students should be conferred qualifications for outcomes defined in negative and residual ways" and "Awards will reflect positive achievements, and will not be offered as compensation for failure at another level".

The use of the word failure is extremely pejorative. There are many reasons why students in their final year may not make the grade to honours, and to be unable to offer these students any award is not only unfair but draconian.

The best of the jest is that these students will be required to gain some further credit before any award is made. Given the introduction of tuition fees and the concept of students as "customers", I can imagine what a good lawyer would make of this absurd situation.

Bill Stewart

Department of civil engineering

University of Glasgow

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Head of Student Records

Bpp University

Business Relationship Manager

Edinburgh Napier University

Talent and OD Consultant

University Of The West Of Scotland

Senior Receptionist

Leeds Arts University

Pastoral Health Tutor Foundation Year

St Marys University, Twickenham