Staff sceptical over streamlining of UCL faculty

February 28, 2008

A decision to separate teaching from research at a world-leading faculty at University College London was billed as a way of streamlining administration and freeing up senior academics' time.

But nearly two months after the reorganisation at UCL's faculty of life science, which boasts an association with six Nobel laureates, sceptical voices remain. One senior academic has even created an "obituary" blog lamenting the loss of his department.

The new faculty structure, which took effect in January, abolished eight old departments. In their place are just two divisions - psychology and language sciences, and biosciences - that pool administrative functions and take responsibility for organising all teaching.

Research is undertaken in a series of ten new "research departments".

"(It is) freeing the heads of research departments to concentrate on research-related matters," said Peter Mobbs, the executive dean of the faculty. He said the change, made without job losses, amalgamates research previously spread across several departments.

But not all academics are convinced of the merits.

David Colquhoun runs an "obituary diary" for the old department of pharmacology on his website. He said that, although it was early days, the new divisions were "far too big" and "without coherent themes" and that power had shifted from active scientists to administrators.

"On the teaching side we can't control what courses we run or their content, and on the research side all sorts of things, such as equipment buying, are decided at a higher level," Professor Colquhoun said.

Another academic who believes the benefits of the reorganisation are yet to be seen is Claudio Stern, professor of anatomy and developmental biology, though he stresses that he is keeping an open mind.

"I do not think the old traditional departmental system is necessarily the best, but at the same time you need to have groups that are small enough for academics to retain some say in how they are run," Professor Stern said.

"The big danger is that teaching and research become devolved."

zoe.corbyn@tsleducation.com.

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Marketing Manager CAMBRIDGE ASSESSMENT
Data Architect CAMBRIDGE ASSESSMENT
Chief Security Officer CAMBRIDGE ASSESSMENT
Cashier Supervisor CAMBRIDGE ASSESSMENT

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Track runner slow off the starting blocks

Lack of independent working blamed for difficulties making the leap from undergraduate to doctoral work

A keyboard with a 'donate' key

Richard Budd mulls the logic of giving money to your alma mater

Quality under magnifying glass

Hefce's new standards regime will enable universities to focus on what matters to students, says Susan Lapworth

Woman tearing up I can't sign

Schools and universities are increasingly looking at how improving personalities can boost social mobility. But in doing so, they may be forced to choose between teaching what is helpful, and what is true, says David Matthews

Door peephole painted as bomb ready to explode

It’s time to use technology to detect potential threats and worry less about outdated ideas of privacy, says Ron Iphofen