So long and sorry: NUS’ Porter apologises for lack of planning over protests

The outgoing president of the National Union of Students has used an opening speech at its annual conference to apologise for elements of his “controversial” tenure.

April 12, 2011

Aaron Porter, speaking at the opening of the conference in Newcastle today, acknowledged that he “did not get everything right”, adding: “For that, I am sorry.”

In particular, he said the NUS needed to improve its involvement in student protests and occupations.

“I don’t think we had a good enough plan for what came after the demonstrations on 10 November and I hold my hand up to that,” Mr Porter said.

However, he rejected claims that he was a “sell-out” and blamed “shadowy” Liberal Democrat advisers and the right-wing press for inaccurate reports.

“The government offered me various deals and inducements and I rejected every one of them, because that was the right thing to do,” he said.

Mr Porter also criticised those who justified violent action by comparing the student protests in England to those going on in places such as Egypt.

“There are lots of romantic notions about the nature of this struggle,” he said. “Trafalgar Square is not Tahrir Square and it is insulting and demeaning to suggest it is.”

In a separate address at the conference, Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, congratulated the NUS for taking part in the protests, which she said “changed the political debate” in the UK.

She also urged delegates to continue to oppose government plans for higher education and “find what unites us: not what divides us – we don’t have that luxury”.

Mr Porter was heckled by a small number of delegates, but the real ire from the conference floor was reserved for the coalition government.

Ms Hunt opened her speech with a crowd-pleasing jibe aimed at the top two ministers at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills: “David Willetts and Vince Cable are said to have three brains between them,” she said. “Wouldn’t it be nice if one of them were working?”

The government’s reform of the student visa system also came in for criticism. Mr Porter said it was going to prove “very expensive for a very cheap headline.”

He also targeted Russell Group vice-chancellors, who he criticised for trying to lower the fees repayment threshold.

Mr Porter also reflected on the anger directed at Nick Clegg, the leader of the Liberal Democrats who was booed when footage of his pre-election pledge to fight tuition fees was played at the opening of the conference.

“We call them the Liberal Democrats because they are liberal with the truth and democratic in spreading the blame,” Mr Porter said.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy