Sir Ron tells colleges: you must sell yourselves

October 25, 1996

The vast majority of employers still need convincing that university graduates are worth hiring, Sir Ron Dearing said this week.

Sir Ron, giving details of the early progress of his higher education review at a Preston conference, revealed that the Dearing committee's five regional seminars with leaders of local small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), where most new jobs are expected to be created in the next few years, had only attracted "modest turnouts".

Most of those who had attended came from the service sector rather than the wealth-creating manufacturing sector.

He said: "The SME executives told me - 'graduates? They're a bit arrogant. And they don't know much. They know the book stuff. But they don't know how to deal with the customer. And we can't afford to train them, you know. They've got to come here running.'" Sir Ron said that universities should go out of their way to persuade SMEs that graduates are an essential investment.

"The onus is on us to sell higher education; there is no obligation for them to come to us. And we should be saying that what we've got to sell is rather good," he insisted.

Not all SMEs need the hard-sell tactic, however. Delegates, drawn mainly from the new university sector, heard about NIS Invotec, a mechanical production engineering company with 300 staff and a turnover of Pounds 20 million.

Owned by a Taiwanese steamship company, NIS Invotec takes the view that, since "knowledge decays", it must invest in upskilling by teaming up with and sending its workers to local universities.

Phil Robson, the company's managing director, said: "We find that the quality of our outside collaborations does add value to our bottom line."

But he also suggested that more could be done to foster links between business and universities.

He recommended that government bring down some of the "ludicrous barriers" set up to safeguard funding council money; universities be awarded funding council points for training company schemes that were on a par with new professorial chairs; and postgraduate training partnerships be given a national rather than just a pilot profile so they have "a real chance of making an impact".

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns