Show that aid to poor works or lose it, says Hefce head

Madeleine Atkins says student opportunity funding ‘will go’ unless government can see a ‘return on investment’

February 12, 2015

Funding to help the poorest students that totalled £366 million this year “will go” under a future government unless the sector can demonstrate “return on investment”, the head of England’s funding council has said.

Madeleine Atkins, chief executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, made her comments on student opportunity funding at the council’s annual conference on 5 February at the University of London’s Senate House.

“It is entirely clear…that this will go unless we can demonstrate a return on investment that is really cogent,” she said.

Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, is said to have tried to scrap student opportunity funding in 2014 during talks about a gap in the budget of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. He is said to have described the allocation as a “slush fund” for universities. But the funding stream was spared after universities, including the Million+ group of newer institutions, lobbied to protect it.

The scheme helps universities to cover the extra costs of teaching students from disadvantaged backgrounds or with disabilities, and supports “work to retain students who may be less likely to continue their studies”.

Professor Atkins said that Hefce was working with economists “to think through what are the measures [of return on investment that] we can use on something like the student opportunity fund”. Hefce’s website says CFE Research has been commissioned to carry out two projects, one of which will look at the fund’s benefits “for individuals and their local communities, and the economy and society more broadly”.

Professor Atkins went on to say that “as we go into the [next] spending review period”, the sector may need to look at “outcomes that we know we need to improve…An example of that is the differential degree outcomes by ethnicity and by social class – a really unacceptable aspect of our system if we are claiming we are one of the best of the world.”

Hefce was supporting research on closing attainment gaps, she said, and “we will need to take that forward as part of any future argument to government for funding”.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham