Scientific community issues united call for global ban on human reproductive cloning

September 24, 2003

Brussels, 23 Sep 2003

Scientific academies from across the world have issued a joint statement calling on the United Nations (UN) to introduce a global ban on human reproductive cloning, whilst arguing that embryonic cloning for research and therapeutic purposes should be exempt from any eventual convention.

The statement was issued by the InterAcademy Panel on international issues (IAP), with the support of over 60 major scientific bodies. It will be presented to the UN committee on cloning, which meets in New York at the end of September to examine the issue of a worldwide ban.

'National academies of science from all parts of the world are united in supporting a worldwide ban on the reproductive cloning of human beings, and in calling for cloning to obtain embryonic stem cells for both research and therapeutic purposes to be excluded from this ban,' reads the IAP statement.

'Scientific research on [...] mammals shows that there is a markedly higher than normal incidence of foetal disorders and loss throughout pregnancy, and of malformation and death among newborns. There is no reason to suppose that the outcome would be different in humans.'

Even if researchers found ways of reducing the medical risk to the cloned foetus and pregnant mother, the declaration stresses that: 'the practice would still face strong ethical, social and economic objections.'

Yves Quéré, co-chairperson of the IAP executive committee, explained why a global convention is necessary: 'Human reproductive cloning is already illegal in some countries, but other countries have yet to pass any laws or regulations. Failure by the international community to issue a worldwide ban on human reproductive cloning will enable unscrupulous individuals to continue to experiment on humans.'

By calling for exemption for therapeutic cloning, the IAP hopes to promote consensus on an issue that threatens to split the UN committee on cloning: the scope of the proposed ban.

The statement argues that: 'Cloning for research and therapeutic purposes [...] has considerable potential from a scientific perspective, and should be excluded from the ban on human cloning.' It concludes by adding that: 'Both policies should be reviewed periodically in the light of scientific and social developments.'

To read the IAP statement, please consult the following web address:
weblinks/WWWW-5RHFLT

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns