Science waits on the cash

May 1, 1998

THES reporters assess the impact of Labour's first year of government on higher and further education and unravel how they have sold their policies to the country

A year after taking office, Labour has raised hopes among university scientists and researchers for the future of science - but it has yet to deliver the goods.

With the appointment of John Battle as science minister and Margaret Beckett directly taking an interest in the subject, the importance of science has been stressed, as has science and innovation's central role in wealth creation.

The government has, however, maintained the status quo with the research councils and the Office of Science and Technology within the Department of Trade and Industry to the relief of some who opposed further change and the frustration of others.

But the government has strengthened science advice through a more open Council of Science and Technology, launched a consultation exercise on its Foresight initiative, which identifies what research to target, and strengthened the Joint Research Equipment Initiative.

But what the government has so far failed to address is the question on all scientists' lips - will there be more money to support Britain's crumbling university research infrastructure, to improve the science base, including blue-skies research, and to allow research councils to increase stipends to attract the best young students to research careers?

The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee has stressed the problems, but for answers we must wait on the comprehensive spending review.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Programme and Delivery Manager

University Of Leeds


Maynooth University

Occupational Health Manager

University Of The West Of Scotland

Senior Veterinary Epidemiologist

Scotland's Rural College (sruc)