Science promotion penalties must go

September 29, 2000

Lord Sainsbury, the minister for science, has admitted that proposals calling for scientists to act as communicators and ambassadors of science need more consideration if researchers are not to be penalised for their initiative.

Lord Sainsbury spoke about the proposals of the latest science white paper, Excellence and Opportunity, for the first time since its launch in July at the BA Science Festival. The paper proposes initiatives to engage scientists in a dialogue with schools and the public.

Lord Sainsbury said: "To retain public support, scientists must continually reach out to new audiences, generate more interest in science, listen to people's views and show the next generation of young people there are few things as rewarding (as science)."

However, scientists have pointed out that measures are needed to ensure that scientists are not penalised in their research ratings for devoting time to promoting science rather than doing research.

Lord Sainsbury felt that such considerations did not deter many people from becoming involved. But he did agree that scientists could be penalised for devoting time to promotion. "I think it's a question of getting one's act together and organising this so that people do know that if they do this, their time is really effectively used, and it has to be valued."

Pat Bateson, biological secretary of the Royal Society, said: "I think one of the major stumbling blocks will be the research assessment exercise. They say they're going to give some account to these things, but I'm not sure people believe it."

The next RAE could address this issue more formally. "We would certainly favour that," Professor Bateson said.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns