Rethink mooted on PhD funding

July 28, 2006

Universities stand to gain greater autonomy over studentships under radical plans being drawn up by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, writes Anthea Lipsett.

The AHRC wants to change the way it awards money to students for doctoral research, from an open competition model to one where universities are given a block of funding, possibly over three years, and are free to decide who gets studentships.

Rachel Cooper, director of the Institute for the Contemporary Arts at Lancaster University and chair of the AHRC group looking into studentships, said: "It would give universities a better understanding of what funding they've got. With open competition they don't know until August whether students will get an award."

Block grants would let universities bid for funding for postgraduate support against their strategic objectives, she said.

"Universities know where they want to go and how they can develop excellent students, so the aim is to produce a system that supports institutions in developing their postgraduate system, courses and PhD students," she said.

"It would allow them to determine how they would like to move forward."

The AHRC also wants to be more strategic with its funding, Professor Cooper said. The group will produce a draft consultation in September, ahead of concrete recommendations in November. It wants to canvass the sector's views before then.

"There will still be an element of competition. We are still looking at that," she said. "People are worried about students losing out on funding.

We've got to make sure that doesn't happen."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns