Researchers have good or excellent access to scientific information, new survey finds

October 20, 2004

Brussels, 19 Oct 2004

An international survey carried out among 4,000 scientific and medical research authors from 97 countries has found that the majority of researchers around the world are satisfied with their level of access to the scientific and medical journals.

The survey, carried out by the Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (CIBER) at City University, London, asked authors how they rated their level of access today compared with five years ago. More than 75 per cent of the people interviewed said they felt that journal access is now better, while over 50 per cent stated it is 'much better' than it was five years ago.

'The [...] study not only showed that most researchers feel they have good or excellent access to scientific publications, but it also showed that quality and integrity of scientific and medical publications is of the utmost importance to them,' said Graham Taylor of the UK Publishers' Association, who initiated the study.

'The authors want the imprimatur of quality and integrity that a peer-reviewed, high-impact title can offer, together with reasonable levels of publisher service,' states the report.

Authors, did, however, express some concern about an arrangement where authors would be required to pay for the publication of their research. Most of the researchers interviewed said they believed the quality would decline under an author-pay model rather than improve.

For more information, please visit the following website:
http:/// mdigenv.php

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns